I appreciate the article, and I think I understand the audience it was intended for. What teaching I do buy is the extreme nature of Christ’s love that presumed to go beyond our human nature. It doesn’t mean immorality, but then I question who gets to decide morality, because it isn’t the current Church.

I probably come the other end of the spectrum where I’d need someone to explain the real downside of extreme tolerance to me. I expect more than tolerance, because in my view tolerance isn’t love.

If all have sinned and fallen short, then everyone deserves grace, even the worst among us. Tying behavior to specific acts undoes the concept of original sin and makes it about works. Where is salvation in this? Where is grace?

Good piece.